Search and Categories

Here’s The Scoop….Update … PRR FOUND ….

BUT…THEĀ  $47.58 COST… …STILL UNFOUNDED! ….

Dear Readers…an update …Looks as thought this writer did request the 9 IT bids…but did not recall…and the e-mail from PIO D’Oliveira stated the request was on 8/6/09…(prev. post)…Turns out the request was made on July 29,2009 (see below)…BUT… while the “lost” request was “found”…the charge of $47.58…is still “UNFOUNDED”!…

“FOUND” E-MAIL ….
Wednesday, July 29, 2009 9:18 PM
From:
“Barbara Cole”
To:
“Steve D’Olivera”
Steve, I would like to make a public records request the bids for the 9 companies whose bids were opened but not read on July 29, 2009 at 2 pm in Town Hall for the IT bid 09-0602
I find it most disturbing that transparency was suddenly thwarted at a bid process.
Please contact me when it will be ready. Barbara Cole

TODAY’S E- MAILS…
PRR Follow-Up
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 10:42 AM
From:
“Steve D’Olivera”
Add sender to Contacts
To:
barbarafcole@yahoo.com
Hi:

The Town Clerk says you did request the IT info for the 9 bids in a July 29 e-mail. If you do not wish to pick it up, please let us know.

Steve
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 10:56 AM
From:
“Barbara Cole”
To:
“Steve D’Olivera”
Steve, I checked, and I did indeed make that request.. ..I was thrown by your 8/6/09 date supplied in the previous post. I did not check back further in my saved e-mails to verify and did not recall it.
I do not think the cost of $47.58 is reasonable. I respectfully ask for the sheet that John Olinzock said would be available without a fee at the August 11, 2009 Jarvis Hall RFP bid “non- read aloud” meeting.
Please let me know when that is ready, and I will pick up all 3 PRRs.
I also ask that going forth I am informed of any additional costs per the 119 statute (sent to you yesterday) before the process begins as it was done previously for Mr. Brandt.
I await your response, and thank you for finding my request.
Barbara Cole

more to come….

Tags: , , , ,

Post Division

Leave a Reply